tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32633290.post6383421384895251435..comments2023-03-29T03:39:37.927-07:00Comments on The Freedom Channel: ron pAul reVolutionNielsiohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07868849666498816846noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32633290.post-22965282640316828532008-01-03T07:53:00.000-08:002008-01-03T07:53:00.000-08:00Sure, stepping back to the political and regulator...Sure, stepping back to the political and regulatory arrangements of the 60's would give freedom lovers a big breathing space to build a stateless society. A stateless society requires 21st century technology, some old ideas, as well as some time. A Ron Paul "revolution" gives us the needed time to escape the closing jaws of 1984.<BR/><BR/>It is therefore rational for an anarcho-capitalist to be a Ron Paul supporter.<BR/><BR/>Finding logical flaws in his adherence to "border security" is like complaining about the deck chairs on a sinking ship.<BR/><BR/><BR/>- heuristicAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32633290.post-47982977894515164312007-12-31T04:08:00.000-08:002007-12-31T04:08:00.000-08:00The exercise is then to redefine the revolution in...The exercise is then to redefine the revolution into that (like you see I've done with the V and the A).Nielsiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07868849666498816846noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32633290.post-1774986161647912792007-12-28T18:21:00.000-08:002007-12-28T18:21:00.000-08:00I support Ron Paul, but he is not a revolution. Th...I support Ron Paul, but he is not a revolution. The real revolution will not come through presidential elections. Ron Paul is actually a step back, as one must sometimes take one step back to take two steps forward. This country is on a dangerous path and Ron Paul is a step back from that, back to where this country was in the 60's, so we can continue the real revolution that started then.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com